Search for: "United States v. Born" Results 741 - 760 of 3,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:55 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:49 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  Mother began living with Bittel while pregnant with child, and after Child was born, they functioned as a family unit. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by Vanessa Sauter
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 pm by James R. Marsh
Both ERJ and LMB erroneously believed that Cambodian children could not be adopted in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 4:39 pm by Enterprise Consultants Group
More than five million United States citizens live outside of the U.S., according to estimates by the federal government. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:01 pm by The JAG HUNTER
Wong Kim Ark (which was citing U.S. v Rhodes, noting that one could only be a British subject or a natural-born citizen, and not hold both citizenships): All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.” LINK [read post]