Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 741 - 760
of 13,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
The FTC complaint does also mention cloud gaming, so the FTC will try to somehow convince the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that the CMA decision weighs in favor of a TRO and a PI. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:29 am
Before the United States Supreme Court handed down its recent 8-to-1 decision in Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied defendants’ motion (Pirani v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The case is Villalpando v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am
Dist. of California (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that "pretrial documents, such as those dealing with the question whether [the defendant] should be incarcerated prior to trial … are often important to a full understanding of the way in which the judicial process and the government as a whole are functioning"); United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In Abrams (1922), an intermediate appellate court overturned the order of California’s blue-sky administrator suspending a dealer’s license on the ground that a security he offered was fraudulent. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
By Kerry Shapiro, Daniel Quinley and Aaron Boudaie On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm
A subsequent outbreak in California in 1985 confirmed the role of food in disseminating listeriosis. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Batson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
From State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
In California, contract principles determine who has standing—the eligibility to make a claim or sue an insurer—to recover benefits due under the policy or for a “bad faith” withholding of policy benefits, as stated in Seretti v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
United States. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:57 pm
With United States v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:10 am
Q: West Virginia v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
