Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 741 - 760 of 6,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:06 am by David Markus
Leon’s 46-page ruling in United States District Court in Washington reopens the district’s long fight over how much room the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to bear arms leaves for local regulation — and whether it applies only to firearms in the home, or to guns carried outside as well.The law gave the police the discretion to grant concealed-carry licenses only to those with “good reason to fear injury” or other specific reasons, such… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:44 pm by CAFE
Code § 371: Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States 18 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:30 am by SHG
United States, there are many reasons to reject the past and leave it behind. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That's not true, and eventually the math will force some behind-the-scenes realism, but likely not until May, or maybe even over the summer.I'm certainly glad the subcommittee restored most probation and diversion funding, but unless I'm misreading my tea leaves, which is certainly possible, the choice to tradeoff vocational ed in prisons and the treatment facility in Burnet with keeping open the Central Unit may bode ill. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement) [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2005] Fam 250, at para 31. 104. [read post]
Whether the prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices in WCPA protects against price gouging is a question of first impression that originally came before Judge Lasnik in the United States District Court in the Western District of Washington. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:42 am
Despite this behavior, Jefferson is a exalted figure in United States history. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that a family is allowed to pursue its lawsuit in California against Mazda Motors of American, Inc. because it made its 1993 Mazda MPV minivan with only lap seat belts in the middle of the seats of the second row in the vehicle. [read post]