Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
As Judge Dyk stated in his concurring opinion denying a rehearing in the Byrne v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 2:56 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
” Many more examples of such notable scholarly exuberance could be offered.So I am now fully confident myself in stating that Kate Masur has written what should be recognized as a classic, upending lots of “conventional wisdom” about the nature of civil rights and protest movements in the United States prior to the Civil War. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:05 pm
In Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Noerr Motor Freight Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 137-38 (1961) and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
China Southern Airlines] shows stylistic and reasoning flaws that do not generally appear in decisions issued by United States Courts of Appeals. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
By March 19, the Commerce Department finalized rules that allowed importers to apply for exclusions from the steel tariffs if a specific steel product “is not produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount, is not produced in the United States in a satisfactory quality, or for a specific national security consideration. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 11:08 pm
" (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
United States, 254 U.S. 141, 143, 41 S.Ct. 55, 65 L.Ed. 188 (1920). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
United States in 2011. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:33 am
In Peviani v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:19 am
The Fourth Circuit, in a surprisingly strong opinion by Judge Wilkinson in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
United States is about a discovery dispute. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
A classic Souter concurrence reads: "I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
