Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 34,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 3:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
Alasaad v. McAleenan: Suspicionless Smartphone Searches at the Border are Unconstitutional, For Now.
8 Mar 2020, 5:08 pm
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com By: Katie Haas In November 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in Alasaad v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:58 pm
Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has reversed a district court’s order compelling a proposed class action lawsuit to arbitration. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:18 pm
By Memorandum Opinion entered on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in SRI International, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
The district court agreed with Maersk, holding that since the contract was negotiated and executed outside the United States, it was not an offer to sell within the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
The US Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear Delligatti v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:57 pm
Bunnell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 12:40 pm
Valve Corporation Case No. 2:17-cv-01182 United States District Court for the Western District of Washington […] [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm
The issue in Mazzari presents itself as a result of the patent applicant choosing to go to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
In a decision that was handed down on June 30, 2010, a United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio has ruled that HUD's sham joint venture guidelines, as contained in HUD's RESPA Statement of Policy 1996-2 (the "Policy Statement"), are unconstitutionally vague, and has granted the defendants summary judgment against claims by the plaintiffs that certain affiliated title agencies violated RESPA. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
Maine Supreme CourtMAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of DecisionsDecision: 2007 ME 139Docket: Ken-06-757Argued: May 23, 2007Decided: September 25, 2007JOHN DOE v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:38 am
The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maine in Watts v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Abitron’s appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was unsuccessful. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Abitron’s appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was unsuccessful. [read post]
