Search for: "United States v. Flood" Results 741 - 760 of 1,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Court--or rather the same five Justices appointed by Republicans who brought us Citizens United--held that Citizens United squarely forbids states from banning corporate spending on elections--whatever the facts in that state. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Bart Torvik
This flood of out-of-state money was made possible, they argue, by the Citizens United decision, which struck down certain limits on corporate electioneering. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:40 pm by Brett Burlison
Let’s hope he is just as correct and that Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
  The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:31 am by Brian Wolfman
This article by the Washington Post's Robert Barnes poses the question whether "anything [has] changed in the world of campaign finance that might give pause to the five members of the Supreme Court who decided Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick Hasen
”   The Senators’ brief, filed in American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:10 am by David Snyder
United States, the Arkansas Game & Fish Commission, sought just compensation from the United States for physically taking its bottomland hardwood timber through six consecutive years of protested flooding. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
The document emanates from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and is titled "Notice of Request for Comments on the Feasibility of Placing Economically Significant Patents Under a Secrecy Order and the Need to Review Criteria Used in Determining Secrecy Orders Related to National Security". [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by David Fine
One of the federal contractors has stated that it is confident the contribution was legal under Citizens United, another plans to ask for its donation back, and the commission appears to be split on the issue. [read post]