Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Holder and Abbott v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:57 pm
A recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in Romag Fasteners, Inc v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
July 29, 2019: Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:50 am
Those of us following the Nokia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
The so-called SSPPU (Smallest Saleable Patent Practicing Unit) method is also discussed: this is a method for calculating royalties that is based on the smallest unit – module, unit or component – that employs the patented technology. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 3 CIT 219 (1982). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Holder v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 pm
Timm, both United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
Longstanding practice indicates that a federal law's creation of an office in this context does not automatically make its holder an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:10 am
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[ii] Nearly one out of every 11 United States publicly traded companies faced a securities lawsuit in 2019. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:28 pm
(quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
The Secretary of State can designate foreign groups "Foreign Terrorist Organizations," which makes it a crime for people to give them various "material support or resources" (see, e.g., Holder v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
§1101(a)(3) (defining "alien" to include "any person not a citizen or national of the United States") with §1101(a)(22) (defining "national of the United States"). [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm
Outside of the beltway, people all over the United States are taking to the streets to demand fundamental change. [read post]
