Search for: "United States v. Hughes"
Results 741 - 760
of 842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
United States The Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that the state’s criminal libel law which allows for punishment of up to one year imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for libellous statements is unconstitutionally overboard. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
”[8] This text states that a corporation’s cooperation with the government’s investigation is a mitigating factor by which a corporation can gain credit. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
” The piece emphasises the need for an Anonymisation Unit and training. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The witness statement of Jemima Khan and second supplement witness statement of Hugh Grant were taken as read. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Germany's ban extends only to prisoners whose crimes target the integrity of the state or the democratic order, such as political insurgents. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:19 pm
See Hughes v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
But most Americans now agree with Warren that the United States in the 1950s and 1960s desperately needed a levelheaded form of constitutional ethics in order to bring the legacy of Jim Crow to an end. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
Does Section 2(a) [of the Lanham Act] fully satisfy the United States' international obligations under TRIPs? [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:21 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
