Search for: "United States v. Martinez" Results 741 - 760 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2021, 3:45 am by SHG
A 2012 Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), holding that an alleged statement by a co-defendant was not incriminating on its face to the defendant; that sufficient evidence supported the defendants’ convictions; and that because one of the defendants performed the same or similar role within the conspiracy as his codefendants, he was not less culpable than most other participants in his relative conduct, he was not entitled to a minor role reduction under § 3B1.2. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
June 1, 2020), and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:48 am
Supreme Court - United States - Law - Government - Supreme Court of the United States [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
United States, a sentencing guidelines case, may prompt the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 3:03 am by SHG
United States, a 7-to-2 decision in 2000. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times discusses the Court’s just-concluded Term and the tension between the Court and President Obama following the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]