Search for: "United States v. Martinez"
Results 741 - 760
of 826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
United States, a sentencing guidelines case, may prompt the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Astrue, 630 F.3d 704, 709 (7th Cir. 2011); Martinez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 26, 2008 Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 3:03 am
United States, a 7-to-2 decision in 2000. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times discusses the Court’s just-concluded Term and the tension between the Court and President Obama following the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
The problem is illustrated Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
All parties agree that after United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 2:43 pm
This is the key part of how the court resolved the ex post facto claim in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
In a thorough and scholary opinion, the Florida Supreme Court concluded that the statute violated the United States and Florida constitutions. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:17 pm
See State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
