Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 741 - 760
of 5,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2008, 11:26 pm
Parish Oil Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:57 am
The United States alleged that Navistar knowingly created fraudulent commercial sales invoices and submitted them to the government to justify the company’s prices. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 3:47 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:35 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
Fair Work Ombudsman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:53 am
Rowe, 552 U.S. at 371 (“pre-emption occurs at least where state laws have a ‘significant impact’—specifically on prices, routes, or services”). [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]