Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 741 - 760 of 1,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
SUSAN COMBS, SUCCESSOR TO CAROLE KEETON STRAYHORN, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00006-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-08)08-0327 WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am by Rebecca Anderson
Supreme Court victory on March 28, in a complex immigration case involving a permanent resident of the United States facing deportation. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines, and Manrique v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Jason Healy explained why civil-military relations in the United States must adapt to new demands or cyberspace may be irretrievably diminished. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Judge Katsas (joined by Judges Randolph and Rogers) succinctly captures the standing analysis with an analogy: In Optimal Wireless v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:46 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
But because such states are unlikely to pay, Congress passed the Justice for United States Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act (the “Act”), which established a fund to compensate terrorism victims. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
The government argues that the Ninth Circuit decision effectively deprived the Philippines of the benefit of sovereign immunity, and in the process raised significant foreign policy concerns for the United States. [read post]