Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 741 - 760 of 3,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 12:41 pm by Unknown
(Arbitration Agreement; Tribal Law) United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 12:11 pm by Rick Hasen
  As I explained in this Michigan Law Review piece on the case, the statement both defies common sense and is in direct tension with the Court’s holding in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:04 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court explains, "Two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as 'Industry Petitioners' and 'Environmental Petitioners,' seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)… [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. [read post]
27 May 2011, 12:12 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  The United States Constitution prohibits states from taxing income where there is no connection between the taxed activity and the taxing state. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:03 am
United States (John Persell) The Duty Question in Special Relationship Negligence Cases: Preserving the Role of the Jury, Marshall v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will interpret a federal statute that imposes additional criminal penalties on repeat offenders. [read post]