Search for: "United States v. State of Washington"
Results 741 - 760
of 9,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 8:08 pm
United States, No. 13-7120. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
In Pakootas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:11 pm
7-1-2009 Washington DC:The United States Supreme Court ruled in Safford Unified School District #1, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:27 am
United States, 06-1509 (3/3/08) (Souter, J.), rev'g 470 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 2006) (blogged here): For tax nerds,... [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
Avvo hopes to eventually include all lawyers practicing the in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:47 pm
Contact: Margaret Dooley-Sammuli 213-291-4190 or Tommy McDonald 510-229-5215 WASHINGTON, DC – The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that SORNA did not apply to this [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:45 pm
It does not, the Court explained, because the commercial activity had not direct effect in the United States under 28 USC §1605(a)(2). -- Clemens Kochinke, partner, Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, LLP, Washington, DC. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm
The case is Mortimer Off Shore Services Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
The decision is reported as United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm
On June 4 I was in Washington and took the oath to join the bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
Washington, DC - The U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 8:38 am
Problem 11 --State of Missouri v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:37 am
Politics Wires has a piece on United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 7:47 pm
The matter reached the Court upon certified questions from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Moreover, many of the dissenters in Citizens United will state at tremendous length why they object.By contrast, look at how Justice Holmes dealt with this sort of problem in Washington v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
¶10 In United States v. [read post]
