Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 741 - 760 of 28,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm by Jeff Redding
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:29 am by Michael DelSignore
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to issue landmark decisions early this summer regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of a suspect's cell phone under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the analogous provisions of New Jersey state law, set rules concerning the manner in which officers can search a person, and/or their home, office or vehicle. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:20 am by Jeffrey Greyber
I have twice blogged about court orders coming out of the United States District of Arizona Court’s Barten v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Bush, as well as the United States, making broad allegations of unjust policies and directives. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:23 am by Daniel Cappetta
” Citing decisions of the United States Supreme Court, the SJC stated, “It is well settled that the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment does not attach until the occurrence of critical stages at or after the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings, whether that be by formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment…. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
”  This well-known quotation has been running through my mind recently as I have been observing the (recurring) debate about how long law school should be in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2022, 7:18 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
However, possibly the strongest potential of the Order does not lie in what it enables, but what it disables: it may deter states that are not a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council from employing insincere human rights arguments as a pretext for a military intervention in a neighbouring state. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by Anna Christensen
United States and Bloate v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm by appealattorneylaw
The Justice Department acknowledges that it has already started restricting when Guantanamo prisoners can challenge their detention in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]