Search for: "V "
Results 741 - 760
of 493,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 4:28 am
JO (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; JT (Ivory Coast) v Same Court of Appeal “The Home Secretary would have to show very serious reasons to justify the removal, on the basis of a criminal conviction, of a settled migrant who had spent the major part of his/her childhood in the United Kingdom, if it would interfere with the Convention right to respect for his/her private and family life. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:37 am
R (King) v Secretary of State for Justice: (Bourgass and another) v Same: CA Civ 376; [2012] WLR (D) 102 “For the purposes of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights there was no civil right derived from domestic and common law to associate with fellow prisoners, so that an administrative decision to segregate or continue segregation of a prisoner was not a determination of such a right.” WLR Daily, 27th Mach 2012 Source:… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:41 am
Same v al-Ghabra; Regina (Youssef) v HM Treasury Supreme Court “The Treasury exceeded its powers by authorising, in on the test of reasonable suspicion alone, a major inroad into the rights of individuals to dispose of their assets as they chose and to live free of executive interference. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:29 am
Atkinson v Supreme Court of Cyprus; Binnington v Supreme Court of Cyprus [2009] WLR (D) 193 “A trial was the legal process whereby guilt or innocence was to be decided and which resulted in a final determination. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; U (Algeria) v Same House of Lords “Appeals from decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission were restricted to questions of law or irrationality. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:53 am
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wright Regina (Scott) v Taunton Deane Magistrates Court Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The expression ‘hunt’ a wild mammal with a dog in section 1 of the Hunting Act 2004 did not include the activity of searching for a wild animal for the purpose of stalking or flushing it. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Regina (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Al Fawwaz) v Same Queen's Bench Divisional Court “There was no common standard for what did or did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment throughout the many different countries in the world. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Regina (Parsipoor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Salih and another) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 276; [2011] WLR (D) 97 “A claimant in a claim for judicial review was entitled to an oral hearing even where the claims were academic. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:02 am
R (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Al Fawwaz) v Same [2009] EWHC 2068(Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 284 “When considering the lawfulness of extradition by reference to the likely prison conditions which a person, if extradited, would face upon conviction in the requesting country, the question whether the high threshold under art [...] [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:35 am
Regina (V: a Child) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School and Others Queen’s Bench Division “The permanent exclusion of a child from a particular school did not engage the fair trial provisions protected by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the standard of proof in establishing facts was the balance of probabilities. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
Moran v Manchester City Council; Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378; [2008] WLR (D) 112 “A women's refuge was accommodation which, having regard to various factors, it could be reasonable for women to continue to occupy. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
Chandler v Camden London Borough Council; Chandler v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2009] EWHC 219 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 58 “A parent of school age children could not be classed as an ‘economic operator’ and did not therefore have sufficient standing under European and domestic rules on public procurement to bring a [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Regina (Aweys and Others) v Birmingham City Council; Moran v Manchester City Council House of Lords “A local housing authority had been entitled to decide that overcrowded families were homeless but to leave them there in the short term; it was a question of fact what term was too long. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:50 am
VW (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AB (Somalia) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 5; [2009] WLR (D) 7 “If removal from, or refusal of admission to, the United Kingdom pursuant to lawful immigration controls were to be held a disproportionate interference with private or family life under art 8 of the Convention [...] [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 pm
Hila Keren (Southwestern Law School) has posted 303 Creative v Elenis: What's Wrong with Preemtive Litigation of Discrimination on SSRN. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
The post Explaining the Oracle v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
Collins v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:46 am
In January changes to the way in which Cargo residues were classified came into effect by way of changes to MARPOL Annex V (see our client alert of 8 March 2013; Revised MARPOL Annex V: Just Who Should Take Out the Trash?). [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
Here are the materials we’ve collected on Nebraska v. [read post]
