Search for: "Washington Citizens Action of Washington v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 1,616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
The Second Circuit says state and municipal officials ought not to be constrained by state law from “voluntarily” cooperating with the feds, but state and municipal officials in this setting are not operating as private citizens—they are operating as state government actors. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am by SHG
Whether your most hated case is Citizens United or Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by Scott Bomboy
The website Politico reported on Wednesday afternoon that a court spokesperson said the media will get notice between 60 minutes and 90 minutes before the findings and orders are announced from the three-judge panel that considered the case of State of Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution limits the "judicial power of the United States"so that it does not "extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:40 am by Luca Marzorati
Circuit is asked to evaluate one potential response: bringing a civil action against the state sponsor. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: At Burnham & Gorokhov’s Legal Blog, Ziran Zhang analyzes the oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:39 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: Trump’s DC hotel turns a loss, say Democrats Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump’s Overseas Interests Violate Constitution Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
., an M.B.A. and a J.D. from Washington University in St. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am by Peter Spiro
They understand that when the states act, it may be without Washington’s approval. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
Government action can take the form of authority for private action e.g., as civil laws against defamation. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]