Search for: "Waters v. Superior Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
District court's order granting summary judgment to two police officers as to an arrestee's U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
Gates v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Molina v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Superior Court of Stanislaus County (March 4, 2010) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (F057690) the Fifth Appellate District muddied the waters some more. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Superior Court, supra; Mark A. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:16 am
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, 455-456, and Franco v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
In the complaint, Duggan Family Partnership alleged that pollutants from the city’s wastewater treatment plant have contaminated water on the plantation, the Ocmulgee River, Palmetto Creek and Turkey Creek, according to the suit, filed in federal court June 8, 2009. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:10 pm
While superiority is a separate base to be touched, it is addressed by many of the considerations that inform a trial court's judgment call about how clearly predominant the common issues must be. . . [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Baykeeper Docket: 09-533; 09-547 Issues: Whether the Clean Water Act unambiguously forecloses a final rule by the EPA ratifying that the use of pesticides in, over, or near waters is not subject to permitting under the CWA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and establishing that pesticides applied in accordance with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act are exempt from the CWA’s permitting requirements in two specific circumstances. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm
White In an unfortunate case for employers, the Second Appellate District, Division One, reversed a trial court’s denial of a motion for class certification in Jaimez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeal held that Ross Southward Tire Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
See, e.g., Hansen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:48 pm
But that's exactly what happened in Case C-398/08 P Audi AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, today's ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:28 am
Bishops, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 12:03 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Affirming this decision on appeal, the Superior Court found the clause to be clear and unambiguous and summarily rejected the plaintiffs' public policy arguments.Offsetting BenefitsThe Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Ins. v. [read post]
