Search for: "Weinstein v Weinstein" Results 741 - 760 of 875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2010, 1:26 am by John Hochfelder
Dept. 2003) - $2,500,000 for past pain and suffering (7 years) upheld for a 43 year old woman in a pedestrian knockdown car accident who sustained several skull fractures and significant and progressive brain damage that left her permanently demented Weinstein v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Posted by William Magnuson, Texas A&M Law School, on Wednesday, September 13, 2017 Tags: Algorithmic trading, Banks, Bitcoin, Crowdfunding, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial reporting, Financial technology, Innovation, International governance, Market efficiency, Moral hazard, SIFIs, Systemic risk OCC Stakes Out a Lead Role in Establishing New… [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
This precise situation, also involving a dispute about how authors were listed, was considered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1987 in a case called Weinstein v. the University of Illinois, and the panel of judges, two of whom were themselves well-known academics, came to the same conclusion — no infringement when one co-owner of the copyright publishes without permission from the others. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson It's likely old news to most OJ readers, but we should still note in passing that the DC Circuit, in a divided panel, handed down an important ATS case, John Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Burning Man’s Burning Marks Nike 3, Jesuits 0 [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Boards of Directors, Delaware law, DGCL, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Safe harbor, State law Lorenzo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:53 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
This precise situation, also involving a dispute about how authors were listed, was considered by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in 1987 in a case called Weinstein v. the University of Illinois, and the panel of judges, two of whom were themselves well-known academics, came to the same conclusion — no infringement when one co-owner of the copyright publishes without permission from the others. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by Vishal Gupta, Sandra Mortal, and Xiaohu Guo (University of Alabama), on Saturday, April 21, 2018 Tags: Compensation ratios, Diversity, Executive Compensation, Management Corporate Governance Deviance Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:04 am by Yishai Schwartz
Yesterday, Paul posted on Lawfare about the Supreme Court’s decision in Air Wisconsin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Bill Otis
 The problem is he doesn't care.Recently he accused federal prosecutors of being extortionists because they do what the Supreme Court explicitly authorized them  to do, to wit, offer sentencing inducements in order to settle cases by plea bargains, Bordenkircher v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:54 am
Cohen, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Sunday, February 5, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Disclosure, Earnings disclosure, Exchange Act, Filings, Financial reporting, IPOs, JOBS Act, Registration statements, Regulation S-K, SEC, Securities Act, Securities regulation, Small firms 2016 Developments in Securities and M&A Litigation Posted by Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Monday, February 6, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Class actions, Delaware cases, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]