Search for: "Wells v. State of California" Results 741 - 760 of 12,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm by Brian Fong
Manageability Presently, under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:17 am by Brian Fong
Manageability Presently, under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Estrada v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
Or, more accurately, my self-assigned mission to read every single one of the opinions published by the California Court of Appeal, California Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit, and U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am by SHG
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:12 am
"Well, the Johnson case has finally made it back to California state court where a hearing was recently held to apply the Supreme Court's Batson standard. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:30 pm by Mukund Rathi
In direct response to concerns about election interference in the 2016 Presidential election, the California Legislature established the Office of Election Cybersecurity within the California Secretary of State's office. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm by Katherine Gasztonyi
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
In the California state case, an individual resident of California, Suraj Kumar Rajwani (“Rajwani”), asserted ownership of the Domain (the “California Case”). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck
Arguing for California, Deputy Attorney General Robin Urbanski jumped right to the heart of the state’s position: Although the California Supreme Court did provide an “adjudication on the merits,” that adjudication was not its conclusion that the trial court violated Batson (and its California state law analogue); rather, it was its determination that any Batson error was “harmless. [read post]