Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 741 - 760
of 12,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
A few states, notably California, generally prohibit post-employment noncompetes. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
Hicks v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:51 am
Data Subject Rights – Similar to other state privacy laws, the TDPSA includes five basic consumer rights: (i) Right to Access, (ii) Right to Correct, (iii) Right to Delete, (iv) Portability, and (v) Right to Opt Out (of targeted advertising, sale of personal data, and/or profiling). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
The Regents of the University of California/Hills Conservation Network v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 pm
Data Subject Rights – Similar to other state privacy laws, the TDPSA includes five basic consumer rights: (i) Right to Access, (ii) Right to Correct, (iii) Right to Delete, (iv) Portability, and (v) Right to Opt Out (of targeted advertising, sale of personal data, and/or profiling). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:57 am
Flooding (AI-generated image) In its recent decision in Ideker Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
Accepting its proliferation will result in a profound aggrandizement of state power that is inconsistent with federalism and separation-of-powers principles, as well as due process, equal protection, and First Amendment rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
(Compare Robinson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am
” Making things even more confusing, the Sponsor Memo appended to the bill states that the law “[v]oids current non-compete agreements and prohibits employers from seeking such agreement. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:16 am
To be sure, in Shurtleff v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And there is no First Amendment exception or California anti-SLAPP law exception for 13 Reasons Why. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
” California v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 7:25 am
’ Universal Underwriters Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:53 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
In California v. [read post]
