Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender" Results 741 - 760 of 1,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by CJLF Staff
  Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
The office of court administration shall determine and publish the income cap. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mann , No. 08-3041 Conviction of defendant for possessing child pornography, supported by evidence found while executing a warrant to search defendant's computers and hard drives for the unrelated crime of voyeurism, is affirmed as, although an officer exceeded the scope of the warrant by opening certain files, those files are severable from the remaining files seized. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mann , No. 08-3041 Conviction of defendant for possessing child pornography, supported by evidence found while executing a warrant to search defendant's computers and hard drives for the unrelated crime of voyeurism, is affirmed as, although an officer exceeded the scope of the warrant by opening certain files, those files are severable from the remaining files seized. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco, California, involving an attempt by 14 states to intervene to defend the Trump administration’s controversial “public charge” immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
” You can see a similar focus on public safety in National Federation of Federal Employees v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Most, even if not all, of the dreadful people in public office were elected in fair elections. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The children were first placed with defendant Catholic Guardian Society and, after approximately two months, were transferred to the custody of defendant LWS. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2020, Steyn J handed down the judgement in DXB v Persons Unknown [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), a claim brought pursuant to “the Venables jurisdiction” for an extension of the anonymity of a child defendant beyond his 18th birthday. [read post]