Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 8,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 8:00 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:14 pm
First, the California Supreme Court in Ross v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
Supreme Court is soon expected to rule on. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
Arizona. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:32 am
A salient example is the case of Dickerson versus United States, where the Court considered the precedential status of Miranda v Arizona. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
” R.C. 4123.01(C)(1) In 2013 the Supreme Court considered the case of Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:45 am
Tony Mauro, Supreme Court Correspondent, ALM’s Supreme Court Brief Dorna Moini, Founder and CEO, Documate Cat Moon, Director of Innovation Design and Adjunct Professor, Vanderbilt Law School Ian Nelson, Co-Founder, Hotshot Legal Craig Newton, Co-Director, Cornell Legal Information Institute Jonah Paransky, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Wolters Kluwer’s ELM Solutions Keith Porcaro, Co-Founder, Digital Public; Adjunct Professor,… [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
Even after admitting that the Gang of Six on the Supreme Court had left in place several unconstitutionally gerrymandered district maps, and then linking to a column that described the Republicans' success in winning elections before they are held, Leonardt oh-by-the-way'ed this conclusion: "[T]he current House map slightly favors Republicans, likely by a few seats. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Arizona’s Maricopa County Will Replace Voting Equipment, Fearful That GOP-Backed Election Review Has Compromised Security MSN – Rosalind Helderman (Washington Post) | Published: 6/28/2021 Arizona’s Maricopa County [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Brewer, et al.Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-16797 September 6, 2011 Judge: Schroeder Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Insurance Law, Labor & Employment Law The State of Arizona appealed the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction to prevent a state law from taking effect that would have terminated eligibility for healthcare benefits of state… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:22 pm
Those are hardly perfect numbers, and I may be misunderstanding the data on the Arizona Supreme Court’s website, but I think I’m at least in the right ballpark. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
Neither “malicious speech,” “invasions of privacy,” “malicious invasions of privacy,” nor “really harmful speech” is a category of speech that the Supreme Court has identified as unprotected. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:57 am
Sandoz, Inc (IPBiz) (Patent Docs) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Brazil: Superior Court of Justice denies Plavix patent extension (IP tango) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Novo Nordisk and Sandoz settle infringement claims in Prandin dispute (Patent Docs) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Supreme Court petitioned to review Federal Circuit patent use code decision: Caraco v Novo Nordisk (FDA Law Blog) [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Will urges the Supreme Court to summarily reverse the decision below, which deems the tax program unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court said more than fifty years ago, in the penalty phase of capital cases those who impose the sentence must consider “any aspect of a defendant’s character or record…proffered as a reason for a sentence other than death. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
The Court appears to be holding United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Alaska 1987).Arizona: Gaston v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided in the week of 10/01/10: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court City of Aberdeen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:01 pm
Looking at these facts, one can understand how the Supreme Court ruled as it did—they favored the father’s position, not his ex-wife’s. [read post]
