Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7581 - 7600 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 12:52 am
I-Hsiung Cheng NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeTenant's Cross-Motion to Dismiss Timely; One Day Notice Adequate if Made Returnable Same as Petition 126 Spruce Street LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance). [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2018, Patten LJ granted the defendant permission to cross-appeal on liability in the case of Ali v Channel 5. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(That's the general choice-of-law rule in cases of libel by media that crosses state boundaries.) [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm by INFORRM
As a result, journalists, which work increasingly on cross-border projects and provide their services to cross-border audiences, and by extension providers of media services, are likely to face barriers, legal uncertainty and uneven conditions of competition. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
Furthermore, unlike the cross-burning proscribed in Virginia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance). [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
[Long Beach Unit], 8 NY3d 465Article V, Section 6 of New York State’s Constitution mandates that appointments and promotions in the civil service of the State and its political subdivisions "shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
Its purpose is to inform rather than to advocate.The following are among the cases reviewed in the Survey: A California Supreme Court decision involving recordings of cross border communications and another California case raising issues of cross-border discrimination in managing a web site; a product-liability decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court backtracking from its earlier pro-plaintiff decisions, and several other cases continuing to apply the pro-defendant law of the… [read post]