Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Let’s talk about those grants in Plain English. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:13 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:55 pm
Thomson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
As you probably do not recall (or never knew), in Taniguchi v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
However, in the English press at least, there is also a different, and indeed competing, conception of journalism, although it’s one which tends to remain implicit and which rarely sets out its stall in the public arena. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:36 pm
Critics could raise problems with English, Hindi, Chinese or French. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
" Gaudin, 415 F.3d at 1035; see also Whallon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
We're going to discuss one of them, the earlier one, today: Deese v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
In a clear favorite for most colorful quote on this issue, the Court quoted the District Court in Cornwell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Merpel adds, is the fact that most of these letters are in English related to the perception that English-language businesses are more gullible, or do our brothers in France, Spain and beyond suffer from the same problems? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
Hardy and Maile v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm
Once upon a time, English public law regarded the function of judges as interpreting and applying legislation in accordance with Parliament’s intent. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related to the… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
Fortunately this weblog has received this very helpful explanatory note, prepared and translated into English by the Kat's friend Stephen Vousden. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:06 am
FAPL is organised as a company, with the different football clubs in the English Premier League as its members. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
Do you read and write English? [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
The case is Lawson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
Serverside Group Limited, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
That case, Digitrex, Inc. v. [read post]
