Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2007, 6:53 am
I previously reviewed the case of In re Tegeder, 349 B.R. 477, (Bkrtcy.D.Neb. 2007) which held that per BAPCPA's amendments, the absolute priority rule no longer applies to the retention of property by individual chapter 11 debtors. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:13 am
(New Albany) d/b/a Re/Max Associates of New Albany (Re/Max), appeals the trial court's order granting appellee-defendant Karen Hupp's motion for summary judgment on New Albany's complaint against Hupp. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
E COURT Case No. ~~07-1499 IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNERespondent [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 3:55 am
Section 362(b)(2) creates a new exception to the automatic stay for an act to enforce a lien against real property when an order allowed by section 362(d)(4) has been entered.Jordan E. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 11:09 am
Johnson, "Dust My Broom", 1936 While I was in a part of the U.S. originally settled by Asians, and later conquered by Russians and Scandanavians, Ray Ward in the Big Easy reminded me by e-mail about Dust My Broom, this classic Robert Johnson song that every R&B musician, from dozens of countries, with or without its ever-changing lyrics, wants to cover and re-cast. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
We conclude that the trial court did not err in denying Mother's motion to correct error.In Gordon B. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
The Debtor had scheduled the stock in his schedule B with a value of $1. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 8:33 am
He said in an e-mail the graffiti crew's tags, which are all over the city, are not only illegal, they are expensive as well. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:13 am
See August 7, 2007 Transcript (Attachment B). [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
Cir. 2005); Kristin E. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(7) of the Florida Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 12:38 pm
"Jordan E. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:41 am
The court did note though that the plan is subject to being modified under section 1329 to increase or decrease payments if circumstances change resulting in different expense calculations than those under section 707(b)(2).Jordan E. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:13 am
The court cited with approval other housing expense cases of In re Farrar-Johnson, 353 B.R. 224 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.2006) and In re Naslund, 359 B.R. 781 (Bankr.D.Mont.2006).Jordan E. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
Thus, while pressure from one's friends to violate the law may be a reasonable mitigating factor in the case of a 12-year-old, it is unlikely to be so in the case of a 17-year-old. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 6:48 pm
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California issued a set of "Guidelines re Sale Orders" as well as a form of "Model Sale Order. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
My point was that PR efforts by the state bar would never convince all those people that they're wrong, because they're right, in part: some lawyers do that.Mark's objection was to the pejorative connotations of that word "technicality," which he wittily describes as "a rule that leads to the wrong result. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 3:01 am
The court concluded that the application of the provisions of 707(b)(2) "involves an evaluation of the Debtor's financial condition on the petition date such that a post-petition surrender of the collateral is irrelevant and inconsequential. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:51 pm
On June 29, 2007, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal in an unpublished decision in In re Rosacometta, S.R.L., 2007 WL 1875646 (C.A.11(Fla.)) upheld the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida's decision below. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 12:11 am
" How this objection interacts with the section 8131(b) funding restriction is oblique, at best. [read post]
