Search for: "In Interest of Doe"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 135,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:19 am
As a retired employee, plaintiff does not have a protected property interest under the Due Process Clause for purposes of finding other government employment. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
While it's dangerous to base one's ongoing work on assumptions regarding what's going to happen in Washington, it certainly does appear to be the case that the enactment of a destination-based corporate tax is dead in the U.S., at least for the time being.But it's an interesting question why this thing, which is so different, at least formally, from what everyone else in the world does, should have risen to such prominence before its apparent political… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:27 am
And it does it well. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:03 am
Hourly billing does not work quite as well for clients, however, because it does not reward lawyers for efficiency. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Turning to the merits of Doe's appeal, the Commissioner said a member of a board of education, as a public officer, takes an oath of office to uphold the law and faithfully discharge his or her duties and a board member must not “disclose confidential information acquired by him [or her] in the course of his [or her] official duties or use such information to further his [or her] personal interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
The court denied PFI's laches claims both because the cancellation petitioners did not unreasonably delay in bringing their Section 2(a) claim, and because laches does not apply in light of the public interest at stake. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Turning to the merits of Doe's appeal, the Commissioner said a member of a board of education, as a public officer, takes an oath of office to uphold the law and faithfully discharge his or her duties and a board member must not “disclose confidential information acquired by him [or her] in the course of his [or her] official duties or use such information to further his [or her] personal interests. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:15 am
I don't quite know why the Senate does it. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
This duty does not fall to Morgan or his attorney at the time. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 10:49 am
DeJesus, a former associate at DLA predecessor Piper Rudnick, does not appear to have an IP focus. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:33 am
Over the past twenty months, the case has inspired many gigabytes of commentary by journalists, bloggers, and interested bystanders. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
A “Security Control Agreement” may be used when the cleared company is not effectively controlled by a foreign interest but it does have the ability to elect or appoint a representative to the Board of Directors. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
A “Security Control Agreement” may be used when the cleared company is not effectively controlled by a foreign interest but it does have the ability to elect or appoint a representative to the Board of Directors. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
Similarly, and notwithstanding the reference to "an independent ... proprietary interest" in Cella, to be merely a shareholder of a corporation, without more, is also not enough. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
These rules are legal.Under the "time, place and manner" doctrine, the government may regulate the time, place and manner of speech in public if the rules are content-neutral, are narrowly-tailored to serve a significant government interest and leave ample alternatives for the speech. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
The book will be a sort of shrine and memorialization of "Grateful Doe" as he's called, as well as an exploration of my obsession with the case and human identity. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:30 am
Unfortunately, the basic/unified exclusion increase does not mean an increase to the annual gift exclusion. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:37 am
Under California law, a recorded interest has priority over an unrecorded interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
It could apply at the strategic level, meaning that it is necessary to prove only that the Wagner Group conducted missions in furtherance of Russia’s strategic interests. [read post]
