Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 13,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Robin Achen at (213) 617-5579. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
More after the break Under Article II, Section 2, cl. 2, the President “shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make Treaties. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
It is important to ensure the technical meaning does not override the need to restrain the meaning within a legal context. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Why does this history matter? [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
Balancing the relevant duPont factors, the Board found confusion unlikely, and it dismissed Opposer's Section 2(d) claim.Dilution: Because Opposer failed to prove fame for purposes of Section 2(d), it perforce did not meet the higher standard for fame under Section 43(c), and so the Board dismissed opposer's dilution claim as well.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
No. 93); 2. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:54 pm
Furthermore, he cites a recent pronouncement of Pope John Paul II that a priest is a unique person and that such uniqueness must be manifested in his dress, I. e., by wearing his priestly collar. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:06 am
— from ABA Journal Daily NewsWage & Hour Take 2: Does Annual FMLA Certification First Require an Employee's Absence? [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:06 am
— from ABA Journal Daily NewsWage & Hour Take 2: Does Annual FMLA Certification First Require an Employee's Absence? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:46 am
Article 12 does not define the term "settled." [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
” When those supposed scandals were making headlines, John Dean wrote a column here on Verdict, finding all three to be “all smoke and no fire,” and predicting that they would come to nothing. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:50 am
The Board noted that even if the applied-for design is more expensive or more difficult to make, that does not mean it is not de jure functional.The Board concluded that the overall design of applicant's pipe boot is dictated by utilitarian concerns and is therefore unregistrable under Section 2(e)(5).Acquired Distinctiveness: For the sake of completeness, the Board considered opposer's claim that, even if the applied-for design were not barred by Section 2(e)(5), it… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
The creditors argued that the resulting debt should therefore be excepted from discharge under §523(a)(2)(A), §523(a)(4) and §523 (a)(6). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
§ 10134(d), (e)(2). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor’s spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband such that his fraudulent… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor’s spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband such that his fraudulent… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:47 am
In In re: John Shart and Elke Gordon Shardt, an unpublished decision by the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Ninth Circuit, the BAP affirmed the bankruptcy court’s ruling that chapter 7 co-debtor’s spouse did not directly engage in fraudulent conduct, but remanded the action back to bankruptcy court for consideration and findings as to whether the co-debtor spouse had a partnership or agency relationship with her co-debtor husband such that his fraudulent… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
An example of such a notation would be ” 08/13/13 – Met with John Doe and Jim Smith, discussed Mockingbird Project, I had concerns re soils issues, JD said experts approved report, JS said project would be done by Winter. [read post]
