Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 7581 - 7600 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm by Elie Mystal
Raelian spokesperson, put the capstone on today’s events:Roehr said the Vatican enjoys observer status in the United Nations because it is wrongly recognized as a state, and that this status has been protecting the pope and Vatican officials in most countries under diplomatic immunity agreements. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm by Orin Kerr
The first case is United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Tony Mauro
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
One such legislator was United States Representative Carolyn McCarthy. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 3:02 pm by Saira Hussain
United States (1969), the Supreme Court held that under the First Amendment only “true threats” may be punishable. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
Gonzales (8-1 decision rejecting broad application of the drug-aggravated-felony category to any state drug felony); Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States No. 17 – 2 has prompted the EU Commission to file an amicus curiae brief, an action which has been considered by Privacy Europe. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:13 pm by PJ Blount
Luongo, Watchlists in United States and Canada: An Intricate Web, p.157 # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, The NW 253 Flight and the Global Framework of Aviation Security, p.167 # Special Report # Ruwantissa Abeyratne, Legal and Aeronautical Issues Concerning the Earthquake in Haiti, p.183 # Arpad Szakal, Conference Report European Air Law Association: 7th Munich Liability Seminar, p.195 # Case Note # Pablo Mendes de Leon, ATA and others v. the UK Secretary of State for… [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck
” Thus, Urbanski stressed, the only question a federal habeas court should ask is whether that determination “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]