Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 13,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In Thoburn v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 11:02 am
“People went to jail. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 8:34 am
This should be confusing to most people. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff argues that strict scrutiny should apply to section 52 under the analysis developed in the 1980 line of cases. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
It does not actually put people on notice that it prohibits such advertisements. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
However, it is still relevant today and seemed appropriate to post for people to understand some of the issues the justice system faces in wrongful convictions. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
However, it is still relevant today and seemed appropriate to post for people to understand some of the issues the justice system faces in wrongful convictions. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Zacchini v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
1968’s Larsen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
The defendants say that the Diocese and its parishes all forfeited their property when the Diocese voted to amend its governing documents so as to make it no longer a constituent member of ECUSA.According to the official line promulgated by ECUSA, "people may leave, but dioceses may not. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
To be clear, religious challenges by corporations will probably continue to “seem weird” to many people—even to people who sympathized with the owners of Hobby Lobby on that company’s particular claim. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
While a person typically has no duty to protect people from third-party harm, there are certain situations in which the lines blur and the rules become tricky. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
Recognizing this burden, and the unfairness of foisting it on an unwilling defendant, the Court of Appeals has repeatedly reversed cases where an affirmative defense was imposed on an unwilling defendant (see e.g., People v Bradley, 88 NY2d 901, 902 [1996] [extreme emotional disturbance]; People v DeGina, 72 NY2d 768, 776-777 [1988] [entrapment]).New York Affirmative DefensesNew York Penal Law Article 40 groups the general affirmative defenses that apply to… [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:35 am
Kali Borkoski: On June 26, the Court announced its decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:13 am
(quoting Wade-Greaux v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
It will put people first and make all social activities beneficial to people's subsistence, enjoyment and development. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
