Search for: "P. T.2" Results 7581 - 7600 of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The results are presented in figures 2 to 8 and discussed on pages 19 to 22. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Steve Matthews
— interprétation de «acte répréhensible» — article 2 de la Loi concernant la lutte contre la corruption — commission d’enquête — secteur municipal — concomitance — présomption établie. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Fareed Zakaria, precisó con gran profundidad que: “[t]he ‘Western model of government’ is best symbolized not by the mass plebiscite but the impartial judge”14. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:57 am by Adam Thierer
Of course, that doesn’t mean I agree with everything in it. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
 (The government confirms (see page 2, n.1) that the other conditions on which petitioners would insist are already part of the government's accommodation regulation.)Two things about the petitioners' demanded conditions are especially notable from a RFRA perspective, and each should be fatal to the RFRA claims of the nine petitioners associated with insured plans. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Acotación: La Defensoría del Pueblo es el único órgano de la constitución que no está con titular electo (requiere 2/3 de ambas cámaras según art. 86). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Washington – Division 1:  The Republic of Kazakhstan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:45 am by Patricia Hughes
As it turns out, however, it really isn’t that simple. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:31 am by JR Chaves
Con posterioridad al trámite de conclusiones, por Orden de 4 de marzo de 2016 se concede la autorización litigiosa, pero condicionalmente y en términos distintos a los solicitados. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Why can’t I just ignore the emotions and do the ‘logical’ thing? [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
But I'm not sure they'd either (1) would, or (2) should prevail.I'm on board for (c)(3). [read post]