Search for: "People v. Herring"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 23,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 10:06 am
In Franchina v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
Amy Howe covers the order list for this blog; her coverage first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:55 am
(and its subsequent case, Musnuff v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 12:07 pm
This fee structure is important for several reasons: (i) It allows people who have been harmed by negligent doctors to obtain high-quality legal representation without having to pay large legal fees out of their own pocket, which most victims could never afford; and (ii) it aligns the financial interests of the medical malpractice attorney with his or her client, as, under a contingency fee arrangement, the more money the client gets from his or her case, the… [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 11:51 am
In Escarra v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 11:51 am
In Escarra v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:32 am
Cramer v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:23 am
Nothing to do with probationState v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 6:54 am
City of Richfield, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
One of her worries about Belmora: remedies. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Baughman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 5:37 am
Below, in EEOC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This case is about two people having sex and whether, at the end of the day, one person’s authority over the other made her do something she otherwise wouldn’t have done. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
This case is about two people having sex and whether, at the end of the day, one person’s authority over the other made her do something she otherwise wouldn’t have done. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
Most drug crimes by definition are transactions that involve two or more people. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
With the Trump Administration U.S. [read post]
