Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 12,220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2013, 8:01 am
In last week’s case (Danielson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
He then took up the defendants’ challenge to the plaintiffs’ 4th Amendment claim, which was that “the school and its administrators violated Juliano's 4th Amendment rights by searching his Twitter account. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
How, for instance, would one popularize such issues as the district and appellate court rulings in Viacom v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:37 am
It took 3 years since New York's workers' compensation reform was signed into law mandating treatment guidelines.It took another 3 years for the first basic set of guidelines to be issued by the state's Workers' Compensation Board.And it took another 3 years for the first level of appellate review to tell New Yorkers that times have changed and that evidenced based medicine is the law of the land.In The Matter of Kigin v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
It took place at the Collegio Carlo Alberto, Torino from 17 to 19 May 2012. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 4:19 am
My topic is “How to Win a Truck Accident Case with 5 Truckers on Your Jury,” and it’s based on my case, Shekoski v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:21 pm
Ramos; People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 6:01 am
Employee rights in the workplace took a step backward with the Vance and Nassar decisions made by the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am
Will Baude took a shot at an answer a month ago, in his post “How Could Surveillance Violate the First Amendment? [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:27 am
By Eric Goldman Ira Arnstein is well-known to most IP professors as the named plaintiff in the copyright classic Arnstein v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
It should be noted that, in an interesting variation of the past trends, the most recent case involves a company based not in the People’s Republic of China, but rather in Taiwan, Republic of China. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
The court rejected, as contrary to the statutory language and logic, the interpretation of CPL 20.10 (4) advanced in the landmark case of People v Puig that the term "community welfare" applied only to CPL 20.40, the county venue statute, and not to CPL 20.20, the State jurisdiction statute. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Before accepting the position, Levine interviewed the people whom she would be supervising. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
The Border Patrol agents took both of them into custody. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
As a result, many people complain and want a "cash-only option": they want a contract for their water that comes with no such requirements. [read post]
