Search for: "ROBERT COMES" Results 7581 - 7600 of 21,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 7:24 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
New York), it’s a safe bet the Roberts Court will be telling us more about the FCA soon. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Other indicators similarly reflect the Roberts Court's lack of productivity. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
*********By the way, Scalia joined in Roberts' comments. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:53 am by SHG
Just in the nick of time comes this post from Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog . [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
“If only good can come from training our adversaries in international dispute resolution,” Roberts wrote, “presumably it would have been unconstitutional to prevent American citizens from training the Japanese Government on using international organizations and mechanisms to resolve disputes during World War II. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
A Volokh reader pointed out that the origins of “Scalito” don’t come from the notion that the two would always vote together; rather, he links to an article that says the name showed an anti-Catholic, anti-Italian bias in the media. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Kagan (joined by Sotomayor in full and Jackson in part) and Justice Barrett (joined by Roberts and Kavanaugh) wrote concurrences. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 2:51 am by Amy Howe
  I covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Adam Liptak of The New York Times. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Marcia Coyle
We do know they are not blank slates when facing each case that comes before them. [read post]
30 May 2020, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
Although the state treats activities like grocery stores and banks differently, Roberts continued, those activities are in fact different, because they do not involve large groups of people coming together in close proximity for extended periods of time. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Richard Hasen
Roberts wrote a particularly vehement dissent for four justices in the Arizona case, and if the meaning of the term “legislature” comes back before the court (as it soon seems likely to do in 2020 election litigation), Roberts will be confronted again with the question whether to stick with precedent or adhere to his own view on the merits of a constitutional case. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:00 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  There is a limited docket, and the judge will quickly come to know the parties and undoubtedly have opinions about their conduct. [read post]