Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 17,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:01 am
§ 1125(a)• Count V: Common Law Unfair Competition• Count VI: Motion for Permanent Injunctive Relief Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief and damages. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Related Issues: PatentsPatent TrollsInnovationRelated Cases: Garfum v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Three published criminal opinions yesterday -- 1) United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:57 pm
In the first of these emails, on 10 November, Hello identified changes which it said were required of Motivate in relation to page count and local content, it being stated that these changes had to be "effective immediately"; Hello also said that it would be limiting renewal of the licence to the UAE alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
The United States Attorney did not want the death penalty. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:03 pm
Criminal procedure — Jury instructions — Accomplice liability Barrington Sweeney, appellant, was charged in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County with first, third, and fourth-degree burglary and two counts of theft of property having a value of at least $1,000 but less than $10,000. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
The four that are here of interest are: First Degree Burglary (Count I); First Degree Assault against Dennis Joseph Smith (Count IV); First Degree Assault against ... [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Inaugural tariffs are, it seems, no longer bankable assets that can justify spending several million dollars on lawyers and “experts” on the nearly guaranteed expectation of generating several tens of millions in return in a few short years mostly at the expense of the general public, as the CPCC and others once counted upon.Moreover, the economics of defending tariffs are changing, with the new phenomenon of major objector associations withdrawing their objections and… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Additional Resources: Birmingham man arrested on child pornography charges, June 2015, AL.com More Blog Entries: Morris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
