Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2007, 4:43 am
If the law were indeed clearly established by our decisions "as of the time of the relevant state-court decision," Williams v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:11 pm
" By contrast, Justice Stevens explains, the state trial judge who rejected Abdul-Kabir's application for habeas relief, did not analyze Penry I at all; instead, the state court relied on the Court's 1989 decision in Graham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Justice Stevens might say yes. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
Texas; Stevens wrote the other two, Abdul-Kamir v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:17 am
Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Quarterman (05-11284) and Brewer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
UNITED STATES - ScaliaNot much to go on, I know. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:35 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:01 am
The Court stated that Romero v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
" United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
" United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Brendlin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:23 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens turns 87 today. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
" (p. 28; emphasis supplied.)Also, as expected, Justices Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter and Breyer dissented. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
It's one thing to take a different view in this case and depart from what the Court did a few years ago in Stenberg v Carhart (the state PBA ban case). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:42 am
The summary of the Court's opinion in James v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
In his concurrence, Justice Thomas states: "I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. [read post]
