Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 12:54 pm
In Cardoni v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:52 am
Jennifer Bridges v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
The short answer to this question: it depends. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am
Why then did Judge Bundy ignore clear caselaw from the Supreme Court of the United States to rule that Dick’s sign violated the local obscenity ordinance? [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:49 pm
This morning, the Court punted away Harvest Rock v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Nigeria Updates on battling copyright piracy in Nigeria (Afro-IP) South Korea Crazy copyright law set to cause chaos in South Korea (TorrentFreak) Sweden New owners of Pirate Bay, Global Gaming Factory X, to adopt ‘give and take’ payment models (1709 Copyright Blog) United Kingdom Microsoft tops Superbrands survey (IPKat) EWHC (Comm) ruling on transmission royalties in Excelsior Group Productions Ltd… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times discusses the Court’s just-concluded Term and the tension between the Court and President Obama following the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:51 am
[v] See, e.g., People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Sponsored Topics: United States - Government - Sonia Sotomayor - Politics - United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946) ("[I]f one cannot say, with fair assurance, . . . that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error, it is impossible to conclude that substantial rights were not affected. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
United California Bank, 350 F. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
For example, the small States’ ability to extract from the larger States a concession on equal suffrage in the Senate derived largely from the fact that the Confederation had established a negotiating baseline of equal State representation – a concession extracted more than a decade earlier. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
