Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 7581 - 7600 of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 11:51 am by Vanessa Sauter
Sarah Grant summarized Judge Cooper’s opinion on motion in limine in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff then brought a proposed class action on behalf of all persons in the United States or, alternatively, all California residents, who since 2005 purchased the men's health vitamin products. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
Except for any disputes relating to intellectual property rights, obligations, or any infringement claims, any disputes with 23andMe arising out of or relating to the Agreement (“Disputes”) shall be governed by California law regardless of your country of origin or where you access 23andMe, and notwithstanding of any conflicts of law principles and the United Nations Convention for the International Sale of Goods. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:45 pm by Linda Odermott
IAALS points to a national 2021 joint study – Justice Needs and Satisfaction in the United States of America (published by IAALS and The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law or HiiL) that noted two-thirds of Americans faced at least one legal issue in the past four years. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Beyond the agency’s security concerns, the State Department feared that United States could be blamed if a terrorist organization committed an act of violence abroad using 3D-printed weapons made with files uploaded in the United States. [read post]