Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 7581 - 7600 of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
S. 138, 142 (1983), which held that “a State cannot condition public employment on a basis that infringes the employee’s constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression,” and Garcetti v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Lyle Denniston
In that new decision, in the case of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
Virginia has contended that it does have “standing” to sue — and it repeated that in its petition to the Supreme Court (Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
The state of Maryland will get a chance to defend its funeral home law before the Justices consider whether they will hear the case. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:22 am by The Legal Blog
This position was subsequently affirmed by Constitution Bench of this Court in State of Bombay v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
And we'll have a chance to talk more about your full life, but I appreciate the opportunity to talk with you.SOTOMAYOR: Thank you, sir. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:30 pm by Old Fox
Every team from all the nations represented had the chance to win the World Cup, but one team was the champion. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:30 am
  We also like that the court did not give plaintiffs a fourth chance to frame a complaint that stated a claim. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Why did Ramsay sue in New York for dissolution of out-of-state businesses? [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am by Andrew Wainer
  But to have a chance at changing the dynamics, it’s important to understand how corruption, inequality and violence (that is, poor governance) affects Northern Triangle countries, severely limiting political and economic prospects for its citizens. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Kohl asked if Sotomayor believed that Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in  Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]