Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 14,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 5:49 am
In 1985, Congress specifically codified an FLSA exception from the statutory definition of “employee” for individuals who volunteer their services to public agencies, defined as “a state, a political subdivision of a state, or an interstate governmental agency. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
Last month, I blogged about how the Delaware legislature was barreling towards passing legislation to reverse the impact of the ATP Tour v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:41 am
Clearly also, “a Union citizen would be deterred from exercising her right to freedom of movement if, in the event that she was pregnant in the host State and gave up work as a result, if only for a short period, she risked losing her status as a worker in that State” ([44]). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
I thought of that scene the other day as I read the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in a case called State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
In Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
Instagram Privacy Plaintiffs Lose Because They Didn’t Rely on Apple’s Privacy Representations &m [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
Grant v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:46 pm
The normal “American Rule” in the United States is that each litigant must pay his/her own attorney’s fees, win or lose. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
Coca-Cola’s argument — is a losing argument Coca-Cola argued vigorously that the Lanham Act was precluded by the FDCA because Congress intended national uniformity as to food and beverage labeling. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:22 pm
See Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
So a North Carolina judge held in Rothrock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:12 am
So holds Monday’s Jones v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:01 am
A recent case, Baur v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Fyffe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
***Any suggestion that this state of affairs is somehow unfair is also unpersuasive: The question here, one must remember, is not whether review may be sought, but rather whether the parties agreed, as a matter of contract, to arbitrate this particular type of dispute. [read post]
