Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
While she continues to oppose enforcement of most substantive limits on federal power, she now endorses “second-order policing of federal-state bargaining,” such as Chief Justice John Roberts’ ruling in NFIB v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:14 am
Court Proceedings Perfunctory On August 12, 2015, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:07 pm
The decision, Katz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed (Katz v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm
After all, I got the Justice who was never in the minority. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The district court observed that in Williams v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm
It was still the minority of time, in general, that Mr. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
Louisiana, a case that could decide which juveniles convicted of murder can take advantage of a 2012 decision limiting sentences of life without parole for minors. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
An excerpt, from Richmond v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Gomez’s opposing affidavit stated that Carrillos held at most a 40% stock interest. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:46 am
Evans, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
