Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 55,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2012, 4:49 pm
That was the reasoning behind the district court’s decision to exclude evidence in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am
This case fails because the sign law was clear and did not allow the locals to censor political signage.The case is Berg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am
The SFPD flouted a law meant to bring democratic control over government access to privacy-intrusive camera networks that can be used, as they were here, to spy on people exercising their First Amendment right to protest.EFF uncovered evidence showing the SFPD broke the law when it obtained and used a business district’s network of more than 300 video surveillance cameras to conduct remote, live surveillance of Black-led protests for eight days in May and June… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
(I expect to assign the first article when I teach Johnson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:03 am
Now, Wendy and her husband will be able to go home.This ruling clearly benefits those people who own their homes and may be at risk of eviction under the sex offender residency law. [read post]
Supreme Court Decision Allows Broader Exclusion of Jurors, But May Further Isolate the Death Penalty
15 Jun 2007, 3:31 am
"(Uttecht v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm
EO-3 may also violate the First Amendment by discriminating on the basis of religion, but our amici argue that Hawaii v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
UK (2008) 47 EHRR 40, a lot of people (around these parts) have been waiting for a case on Article 8 and the rule in Hammersmith v Monk (Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
The government wants people to register their copyrights, however. [read post]
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Apple v Samsung changed perceptions. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
But Nokia also appears to be violating EU antitrust law with respect to Daimler even if one ignores the suppliers for a moment as the CJEU held in Huawei v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:29 pm
Last week in State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
, and the results were as follows: 23 people (41%) thought that the CJEU has not yet been asked to rule on national systems of subject-matter categorisation; 22 people (39%) believed that the answer should be in the sense that we are now required to protect anything that is a 'work' if it displays sufficient originality;Finally, 11 voters (19%) held the opinion that it all depends on whether the CJEU wants to have a particular work (eg a graphic user interface) protected… [read post]
12 May 2021, 1:16 pm
The case is TW v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
(I have no one in particular in mind here, but, by way of example, in recent years a number of people seem to have argued both sides of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Miller (Duke University School of Law), Alexandra Filindra (University of Illinois at Chicago), & Noah Kaplan have posted Technology, Tradition, and "The Terror of the People" (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
