Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7581 - 7600 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: The case involves the “different occasions” clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Facebook the Northern District of California has accepted that Facebook’s Terms of Service include valid a choice-of-law California law provision. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  That legal challenge went all the way to the United States Supreme Court (the highest court in our country), which ruled in favor of Anna Nicole Smith in 2006. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:20 pm
”Plaintiff’s evidence evidence mainly consisted of a one-page map of the United States with text stating: “100% Hispanic Coverage more than 50,000 points of sales, 220 Food Service Distributors, 209 Distributors. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:50 pm by Ted Frank
As Judge Easterbrook states in Union Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
On September 18, 2009, Ricoh Company, Ltd of Japan, Ricoh Americas Corporation of West Caldwell, New Jersey, and Ricoh Electronics, Inc. of Tustin, California (collectively, "Ricoh") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, two cases in which the Court recently granted review that could have potential implications for the intersection of criminal law and immigration. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
United States (April 26):  Whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:31 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:14 am
Glucksberg and Vacco v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am by Sheppard Mullin
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Scott Bomboy
United States decision, Chicago believed the 10th Amendment “prohibits the federal government from… command[ing] the States’ officers . . . to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. [read post]