Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Concluding this part of its analysis, the court stated that “[a]ny doubt as to whether Pulse’s contracting activities in the United States constituted a sale within the United States under § 271(a) is resolved by the presumption against extraterritorial application of United States laws. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:55 am
Let’s talk about Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
American Regulation The situation in the United States is quite different, at least for commercial use. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
To set the stage for this case, Omnicare is the largest provider of pharmacy-related services for the elderly and other residents of long-term care facilities in the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation (Winrow v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
” The brief closed with a direct challenge to the State Department’s concern about [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
However, the Superior Court decided in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
Acting Energy Envoy for the United States, Amos Hochstein, said that the Kurdistan Regional Government has arrested people accused of smuggling. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
However, as the Safe Harbor only permits transfers from the EU to the United States, it is not a global solution. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
See New York et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
The claim in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:53 am
In Matter of R.B v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
But I swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States and I witnessed the NSA violati [read post]