Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In doing so, the Court had this to say about Concepcion: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
In Oppenheimer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:29 am
The Gap, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:56 am
As Judge Posner wrote in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Spognardi Chicago Partner Mark Spognardi is the planning chair for tomorrow’s ALI-ABA teleseminar Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
”One year later, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 30089/04 [2011] ECHR 1121 (19 July 2011) ? [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:13 pm
: Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd v Khek Tai Ting (PatLit) South Africa Protecting image rights (IP finance) South Sudan South Sudan: no IP change yet (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat) finds Select exclusive licensee of patent but patent invalid and not infringed: Select v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:31 pm
In 1943, Congress amended the False Claims Act to implement a number of safeguards that are present today to enable the United States control over False Claims Act litigation. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:59 am
Brief of the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
(Tangible IP) Australia Use of a trade mark on a website as trade mark use in Australia: International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited (JIPLP) Belgium Google v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
United States and reached different results in cases involving the revocation of a defendant’s supervised release. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
First, these bills permit only the United States standing to sue for the per article fine. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:05 pm
Swartz was indicted last Thursday by the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, Carmen M. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
The contents include: Mark Lemley’s Nies Lecture, “Can the Patent Office Be Fixed? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm
On July 15, 2011, in Turner and Jones v. [read post]
