Search for: "- No case name available -"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 30,132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am
The position is available from 1 June 2020 or as soon as possible thereafter. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:50 am
This case is different from a recent GAO decision that similarly involved allegations of materially misrepresentation of the availability of contract personnel. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
Successes in both cases (such as they were) seemed inflated, and setbacks were downplayed. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
There were 255 cases of Salmonella confirmed across 32 states. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 8:01 am
Oracle** case. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:16 am
This prior art became relevant because the opposition division did not acknowledge the patentee's claim to priority from a US provisional application naming more applicants than the subsequent PCT application from which EP 2771468 is derived. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As part of its enforcement activities, the Food and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities under its jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm
The leading case in Ontario is Warman v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 1:23 am
It should, however, be borne in mind that the Federal Republic did not at present intend to avail itself of the option available under para. 1(b). [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
“The museum has a display of over 1,500 items, incorporating case files and documents of the Indira Gandhi assassination documents, Mahatma Gandhi assassination case, and the Shah Bano case, to name a few. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:33 pm
Like honestly this film #JustMercy is about one of his cases and I feel it’s going to be a must watch! [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
Conversely, if the Supreme Court holds that “generic.com” names cannot be registered, well-known domain names could lose protection and companies may reconsider the use of such names in the future. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
The regulations to these provisions (still not available, at the time of writing this article), may well include further guidance on how individuals who are not shareholders, may qualify as an individual with “significant influence” over a company. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 10:43 am
Additional options are available to whistleblowers at the state and international levels. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
This post has a different purpose—namely, to document the significant shortcomings in the SSCI study that have little to do with the important debate over whether EITs were legal, moral or effective. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 5:27 am
In the case of hidden services, we ask: In the pursuit of greater privacy, are we sufficiently considering the cost to society? [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
The majority made the case that political spending from independent actors, even from powerful companies, was not a corrupting influence on those in office. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am
In the former case a manifestly disproportionate test is applied, in the latter case a least restrictive means test. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Of those patients with complete information available, 11 were so sick they had to be hospitalized. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:26 pm
Although I'm a big fan of Tyler's work, I am skeptical about both the normative and the positive aspects of his case for SCL. [read post]
