Search for: "California Department of Justice"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
California was the leading state of residence of new LPRs, with 20% of new LRPs residing in California. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
Aiko also worked for the Department of Justice’s Office of Redress Administration to help identify individuals in the Nikkei community eligible for the presidential apology and redress payment. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:31 pm
All our lives we have been taught that when someone uses or sells drugs, justice dictates that he or she should go to prison. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
Steven Fenzl, a California resident, was also sentenced by U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
While a February 23, 2011 order from President Obama prevents the Justice Department from enforcing DOMA, the Department of Justice, through the US Trustee's Office, attempted to enforce DOMA in the case of Gene Douglas Balas and Carlos A. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Department of Justice believes DOMA Section 3 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Department of Justice believes DOMA Section 3 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Department of Justice “Redistricting by Citizens Has Test in California” New York Times, June 10, 2011 KQED Forum Broadcast “California’s New Political Boundaries”, June 13, 2011 Brennan Center for Democracy – Redistricting Blog Brennan Center 50 State Guide to Redistricting Communities of Interest – A summary capturing the provisions of state law that require consideration of communities of interest prepared by the Brennan Center [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Department of Justice “Redistricting by Citizens Has Test in California” New York Times, June 10, 2011 KQED Forum Broadcast “California’s New Political Boundaries”, June 13, 2011 Brennan Center for Democracy – Redistricting Blog Brennan Center 50 State Guide to Redistricting Communities of Interest – A summary capturing the provisions of state law that require consideration of communities of interest prepared by the… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Although the Justice Department is no longer defending Section 3, until it is repealed it is bound to enforce it, which is why US trustees continue challenging joint bankruptcy petitions by married same-sex couples. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Furthermore, when the appellant indicated, during the course of her direct examination, that a certain document which would support her defense had been turned over to a Probation Department officer, the Judge interrupted her testimony to question a Probation Department Court Liaison who was present in the courtroom about whether documents of this nature would indeed be kept by the Probation Department. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm
The House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group — which is defending DOMA in lieu of the Justice Department — was granted a continuance to consider whether to intervene. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:42 am
The court relied heavily on the Department of Justice's policy letter on not defending DOMA in circuits where its constitutional validity has been questioned. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:41 am
All our lives we have been taught that when someone uses or sells drugs, justice dictates that he or she should go to prison. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:55 am
While the Department of Justice has stated that it would no longer attempt to enforce DOMA, it did (through the Office of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.Derrick L. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 8:17 pm
Department of Justice had also filed a parallel lawsuit. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:40 am
According to the California Department of Justice, in 2009, 59,253 felony offenses were filed in juvenile court and 39 percent were for property offenses. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:32 am
The Justice Department’s Civil Division said the historical significance of the testimony does not give courts authority to intrude on the secrecy of the grand jury. [read post]
