Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2019, 10:25 am
” Like many things in law, this rather confusing definition was later refined by the court in People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:18 am
Cydney Posner, A First Challenge to California's Board Gender Diversity Law It was only a matter of time. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:15 am
Of note for many employers is the California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently issued a decision (in Baca v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Governor Brown vetoed a similar measure last year and stated it “plainly violates federal law. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:54 am
As reported here on Bloomberg, a conservative activist group has filed a lawsuit, Crest v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:33 am
This Kat is always thinking.On the 1709 blog, Ken Moon discussed the Court of Appeal for the 2nd Circuit's case of Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:01 am
Uelmen observed (“Tribute to Justice Stanley Mosk,” Albany Law Review Vol 65, 2002): Two years before the Supreme Court struck down racially restrictive real estate covenants in Shelley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:13 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
Kaminskiand William McGeveran, University of California, Davis – School of Law, University of Colorado Law School and University of Minnesota Law School Data Management Law for the 2020s: The Lost Origins and the New Needs, Przemysław Pałka, Yale Law School [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:17 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
The policy provided that New York law applied. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
George has been solely or principally responsible for such landmark Indian law decisions as, Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm
During jury selection in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 11:00 am
California’s highest court held yesterday in Pitzer College v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Yesterday I attended and reported in detail on the Munich I Regional Court's preliminary-injunction hearing in Nokia v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:41 pm
At this time, AB 5 is the only legislative vehicle still in play regarding Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Indeed, this is the stance taken in the lawsuit filed by California and other states against the new DHS rule. [read post]
