Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7601 - 7620 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not met,… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
(Photo by Bruce Bennett Studios/Getty Images) From Allianz Suisse Versicherungs-Gesellschaft v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am by Alex R. McQuade
Daniel Byman analyzed the Islamic State’s archipelago and examines the pseudo-state’s many provinces. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by Jan von Hein
It involves the actual pursuit of an economic activity through a fixed establishment in another Member State for an indefinite period (CJEU in Factortame and Others, C-221/89, para. 20 and Commission v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Hospitals Corporation cross-moved for a change of venue and to vacate the guardianship order. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
Mother thought this `crossed the line’ because Kays had not received parental permission for the trip. [read post]