Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 6:33 am
The defendant argues that McCualey is unqualified as a non-scientific expert as he does not have the background as a beat cop nor did he work on the ground as a cop for any meaningful amount of time. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 5:06 pm
At all relevant times, Defendants Awute and Doe were acting as employees and agents of Defendants Caldwell and Billion Dollar Baby Entertainment, LLC. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:57 am
” Accordingly, Plaintiff does not wish defendants’ websites to steal Manolo Blahnik’s goodwill created over the years with its consumers and requests the Court – without prior notice to defendants – to issue: (1) a temporary restraining order against Defendants temporarily enjoining the manufacture, importation, distribution, offer for sale and sale of Counterfeit Manolo Blahnik Products; (2) an order temporarily transferring… [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:10 pm
“While the … defense is unfavorable to Plaintiff, it does not ‘cast a cruelly derogatory light on’ Plaintiff as necessary for the Court to conclude that the defense is scandalous. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
In cases involving multiple defendants, the question arises in terms of when does the time to remove the case to federal court expire. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:01 pm
United States that "a district court does not violate the defendant's constitutional right to an Article III judge" when jury selection is delegated to a magistrate judge, with the defendant's consent. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm
Here, by contrast, the record does not suggest that the subject accident was the result of the defendant's attempt to flee from the police, and there was factual proof that the defendant had several opportunities to cease his procession towards oncoming traffic. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
For him, because an § 846 conspiracy does not require an overt act, while a generic conspiracy does, an § 846 conviction cannot qualify for a 16-level upward adjustment. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:16 pm
If it does, we hope that the Supreme Court recognizes the importance of laches and does not give patent trolls even more ammunition by taking away this important defense. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 11:42 am
The Third District decided that a waiver does not occur under these circumstances. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
Applying this New York test, the Court held that"the fact that defendant reached for his waistband, absent any indication of a weapon such as the visible outline of a gun or the audible click of the magazine of a weapon, does not establish the requisite reasonable suspicion that defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime" (Riddick. at 1422-1423; see Sierra, 83 NY2d at 930; cf. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
Defendant asserts no suspect classification and because the statute does not jeopardize a fundamental right, the classification in § 28-320.02 is subject to a rational basis review for equal protection purposes. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Three King County Jail officers then pounced on the defendant, Abdi Abukar, one witness said. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Officers approached defendant’s house to conduct a knock and talk. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:04 am
The opinion also criticizes the policy because it does not pay the compensation costs of in-house counsel. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:02 am
The surety, as it usually does, was checking the status of the case for the trial date etc. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:52 pm
Calmese, District of Oregon Magistrate Judge Janice Stewart recommended that the court grant Adidas’ motion for summary judgment that its use of “prove it” does not infringe defendant Michael Calmese’s PROVE IT! [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:02 pm
[This is a stretch to find reasonable suspicion, which it does.] [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:42 am
November 12, 2008).* Defendant’s swerving was reason enough for a stop that the defendant might have been falling asleep while driving. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:04 pm
What this section of Florida’s statute does is defines the type of situation that would justify deadly force. [read post]
