Search for: "IN RE B E S"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
For the reasons that follow, the bankruptcy court's judgment is AFFIRMED. 07b0009p.06 2007/07/25 In re: Morgeson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:26 pm
Mercer Human Res. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
The Ferrari court found three statements from Bates pertinent:Bates found that the defendants there had not offered any "plausible alternative reading" of the statute that supported broad preemption, and that "[e]ven if" there had been a plausible alternative reading, "we would nevertheless have a duty to accept the reading that disfavors pre-emption. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
§ 271(e). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:40 am
" The court disagreed with the creditor's contention that the Eleventh Circuit implicity recognized an unsecured creditor's entitlement to attorney's fees in In re Welzel, 275 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir.2001).Robert Eisenbach, III of In the (Red) Business The Bankruptcy Blog points out in a post dated July 26, 2007 that the Middle District of Florida Bankruptcy Court did not cite to the In re Qmect, Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
The Federal Court of Appeal denied the appeal but referred the matter back to the trial court for a re-calculation of damages. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:10 am
with James E. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:46 am
Section 707(b)(7)(A) though does require the inclusion of the debtor's spouse for its calculation. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:51 pm
. ------------------------------------------------------- 9 10 E X C E R P T 11 PROCEEDINGS: Continued Evidentiary Hearing 12 Concerning lethal Injection (Diaz Issue) 13 BEFORE: Honorable Carven D. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:13 am
The court's logic may be puzzling, as section 522(b)(3) directed the debtor to use the applicable law of the particular 180 day state. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 12:07 pm
The Court in In re Munger, 2007 WL 1810701 (Bkrtcy.D.Mass.) [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Elle peut éviter de s'endormir dans un confort mortifère, à l'abri de protections artificielles, ou d'abuser d'une position de monopole. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
(In case you're reading this and not studying for the bar there is no E, F, G or H). [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
He's Mark Bennett, the Houston criminal defense lawyer (and terrific blogger), and his e-mail address today ends in fightthefeds.com. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:53 am
Perhaps an attempt to exempt the real property as tenants by entireties property under 522(b)(3)(B) would have been subject to avoidance.Jordan E. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:15 pm
Last week Lamone, Maryland's Board of Elections administrator, was chastised by the governor after Wired News revealed Lamone's participation in a Diebold brochure praising Diebold's new e-pollbook product -- a product that experienced widespread failure during the state's September primary last year. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:39 pm
;c) If unemployed, intentions regarding re-employment, rehabilitation plans (i.e., education and time needed to acquire work experience) and child care; d) Your plans for employment in the future; e) Your plans for retirement. 10. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Zywicki & Anthony B. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Armistead and Bernice B. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:18 pm
However, without any finding of violation or other wrongdoing, simply on account of changed circumstances, after re-considering the 3553(a) factors [other than (a)(2)(A) (the seriousness of the offense, respect for law, and just punishment), but including (a)(2)(B) and (C) (deterrence and protection of the public), and notably including (a)(4) (the applicable guideline range)], the judge can modify the conditions of supervised release. 18 USC 3583(e)(2). [read post]
